Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

Support this workshop at Esalen: Urban Yogi Teacher Training

Posted on Jul 31st, 2008 by Andrea : Sacredchakras Andrea
I attended this amazing week-long training last year and I highly recommend it to anyone interested in yoga, bodywork, healing or psychotherapy. Julian and Hala are both excellent teachers with over 15 years of experience combined in yoga, counseling and bodywork. For more information, check out this link.

Take advantage of this opportunity and don't miss out on this workshop at the beautiful Esalen Institute, Sept. 7-11/08!
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (453)  

Another great reason to avoid eating factory farmed beef

Posted on Feb 18th, 2008 by Andrea : Sacredchakras Andrea
As if contributing to global warming weren't a good enough reason, here's one for you:

Factory Farming Campaign: HSUS


From the HSUS newletter:

Yesterday, the USDA issued the largest recall of beef in U.S. history, the latest action in response to The Humane Society of the United States' groundbreaking undercover investigation of a dairy cow slaughter plant in Southern California.


The recall of 143 million pounds of beef came two days after San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael Ramos filed criminal charges against slaughter plant workers caught on video torturing crippled cattle, and two weeks after the USDA shut down that slaughter plant.


The Humane Society's undercover investigation revealed shocking abuses of "downed" dairy cows -- those who are too sick or injured to walk -- at the Hallmark Meat Packing Company slaughter plant. Cows too weak to stand were dragged along the ground, shocked with electric prods, rammed with forklifts, and even forced to endure water being forced into their noses and throats -- an act right out of the manual on water boarding.

The video of the cruelty is very difficult to watch. Even worse is the thought that an outfit like Hallmark Meat Packing Company got away with this kind of abuse every day, without proper oversight from the USDA.


Urge the USDA to tighten its lax enforcement of the downer rule and to close the rule's loophole
 -- so that cows who are obviously in no shape to walk are not brought to slaugherhouses in the first place and then abused once they are there.


You can take action and practice some ahimsa here

Namaste,
Andrea


Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (297)  

Cool videos and music on the DoLab Artist Network

Posted on Feb 10th, 2008 by Andrea : Sacredchakras Andrea

Durian


You can check out their top 2008 listings at http://artistnetwork.thedolab.com/winter08/.

Andrea


Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (114)  

The Story of Stuff

Posted on Jan 16th, 2008 by Andrea : Sacredchakras Andrea
You may have already seen this (it's been posted on a few newsletters I receive) but if you haven't, it's well worth your time to watch, and share...

http://www.storyofstuff.com/

From their website:

What is the Story of Stuff?

From its extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns. The Story of Stuff exposes the connections between a huge number of environmental and social issues, and calls us together to create a more sustainable and just world. It'll teach you something, it'll make you laugh, and it just may change the way you look at all the stuff in your life forever.



Tides Foundation,

Access_public Access: Public 2 Comments Print views (167)  

Holiday gift shopping, now with free shipping!

Posted on Nov 17th, 2007 by Andrea : Sacredchakras Andrea
Banner

Dear Zaadzters!

Get ready for the holiday gift-giving season with unique surprises for friends, family and your other favorite people. Shop unique designs on popular items including apparel, mugs, bags, as well many exciting new organic products! Visit Sacred Chakras at http://www.cafepress.com/sacredchakras and give an original gift to everyone on your list.

Shopping at Sacred Chakras is easy and hassle-free with the CafePress Satisfaction Guarantee that includes 30-Day 100% Money Back on all returns.


Gifts for Her:
http://www.cafepress.com/sacredchakras.13120188

http://www.cafepress.com/sacredchakras.13120450


Gifts for Him:
http://www.cafepress.com/sacredchakras.13120693

http://www.cafepress.com/sacredchakras.13121058


Gifts for Babies:

http://www.cafepress.com/cp/members/products/preview.aspx?s=sacredchakras.0

If you shop now, from November 17-26, 2007, CafePress is offering free shipping with minimum purchase of $75*.  The coupon code is FREESHIP75.

Hurry! This special offer will end on November 26, 2007.  Stop by today at http://www.cafepress.com/sacredchakras and be done with your holiday shopping early!

Namaste,
Andrea

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (292)  

A psychodynamic interpretation of the film, “The Matrix”

Posted on Aug 9th, 2007 by Andrea : Sacredchakras Andrea
(This is from a paper I wrote for school recently--I was inspired to post this after reading Julian's blogging on the Matrix trilogy!)

The film “The Matrix” is a brilliant story about a man’s journey into spiritual and mental health. Through a psychodynamic lens, I will interpret this movie with the psychoanalytic principles of Carl Jung, Melanie Klein, Heinz Kohut and Jacques Lacan. In the movie, Neo goes through a process of psychological development that has been evolving over several lifetimes, denoting a process of reincarnation. Neo is not suffering from a psychological disorder, but is on a journey of self-discovery to understand his truth and become an individuated person. In doing so, Neo abandons and rejects the “system”, renouncing authority by hacking the internet at night, in effort to find out what the “Matrix” is, and with his continual lateness at his job (as a computer programmer for a corporation) during the day. In a moment of foreshadowing, his boss tells him, “You think you are special, and that the rules don’t apply to you”. Neo’s rebelliousness is the state of the pre-individuated ego, before the birth of awareness of the Self, and makes sense when we learn that he is in the process of uncovering his true Self, questioning the different parts of his life experience so can he come to know what is the truth. We later learn that the rules don’t apply to Neo because as Morpheus tells him, he is the one “who can break the laws of the Matrix”, whereas everyone else can only bend them. In the end, Neo hacks the system of the Matrix by becoming like a powerful hacking program himself, and destroys the whole “system” of thought in the process.

“What we are to our inward vision, and what man appears to be…can only be expressed by way of myth” (Jung, 1961, p. 3). The Wachowski brothers took Jung’s theories of psychological development to heart when they wrote the script for the movie, “The Matrix”. The Matrix, according to Carl Jung’s theory, is the mind; particularly, the unconscious mind. Within the mind, there is the unconscious, and the conscious mind. The unconscious mind is divided into two parts, the collective unconscious, and the personal unconscious, which are where the archetypes we see live, as well as one’s shadow, and anima, within one’s true Self.

Neo begins the film as Thomas Anderson but is “reborn” as “Neo”, Greek for “new”, and an anagram for “one”. Over the course of the film, Neo goes through a process of exploration of the mind and ego in the Matrix. Neo first meets with Trinity, a master computer hacker, in a nightclub after she sends him a message on his computer to “Wake up Neo”, along with some friends to convince him to go out with them, as part of a plan to rescue Neo from the Matrix. This represents a message from the Self to the sleeping Neo’s egocentric psyche, literally and figuratively. As Neo’s anima, she is also the doorway to his true Self, and the one that leads Neo to the truth, to confront his shadow and destroy it. Jung called the anima a soul figure, one that occupies an area or boundary between the personal unconscious and the collective unconscious. Trinity cleanses him of the bug that the system, or the shadow put in him, in order to bring him into the real world, or personal consciousness, where he regains a sense of choice. By saving Neo in the Matrix when he is overtaken and killed by Agent Smith, who represents his shadow, she plays the heroine to his hero character and hero archetype that Neo plays in this story. I enjoyed how the anima was played by a somewhat androgynous heroine having the name of a patriarchal metaphor, and when Neo says, “I always thought you were a guy”, he is alluding to the gender stereotype in hackers. Trinity plays a mirror to Neo as his anima, and together they learn how to feel true love, how to transcend dichotomies and how to live connected to the heart, and not to the ego.

Neo’s relationship with Trinity demonstrates Jung’s “transcendent function”, and is a union of the conscious and unconscious, which happens through falling in love with Trinity, as well as by identifying with Trinity as his anima. It is here the self-realization process begins, driven by Eros. Additionally, the union of the numbers one (“Neo” re-arranged) and three (Trinity) creates the number four, which Jung believed represented wholeness in the human psyche.

In the film, Neo’s dissatisfaction with life leads Neo to accept Trinity’s offer of an introduction to Morpheus, a legendary hacker who tell him the answer to his question, “What is the Matrix?” Morpheus acts as Neo’s teacher, psychotherapist and father archetype in the story. Through firm support and belief in Neo as being the “One” that can break the rules of the Matrix, and training him with solid skills to do so, Morpheus helps Neo to reestablish a healthy relationship to his unconscious, and find his true Self. Both Morpheus and Trinity act as Neo’s father and mother archetypes, acting as his mentors and caregivers in a new world he awakens into, reborn and nurtured to health, as a both a baby and person in need of therapy. We end up with a new trinity in the process; that of Father (Morpheus), Son (Neo), and Holy Spirit/Mother (Trinity).

In the therapeutic context, the Matrix may represent our set of beliefs, values, and ideals in society, as well as social norms into which we often unconsciously follow, even when they are not conducive to individual development. Psychotherapy may help individuals master this conflict between individuality and social norms. Likewise, the Matrix may represent a blend of our own fantasies about ourselves and the world, from which we need to be freed. When Morpheus tells Neo to “Free your mind” and jumps from one building to the next in a single bound, we see the therapist help Neo to see and try new alternatives to situation in life. This use of the teacher and father and therapist archetypes combined in one person for Neo is a powerful experience for his personal development. Morpheus challenges Neo on many levels in the training construct, with programs such as the jump program and the Kung Fu training program. These interactions symbolized confrontation as a therapeutic intervention. This helps to give Neo’s defenses a push, and invites his libido to some healthy narcissism in order to develop a self-knowing, as well as break down old, unhealthy defenses and build new, healthier ones. Here, Morpheus challenges the patient’s mistaken assumptions and cognitions about himself and the world. At times, Neo resorts to phallic and narcissistic defenses, as seen when he plans to rescue Morpheus, with “Guns. Lots of guns”. In the end, Neo must defeat the agents without any weapons except his own mind. Neo’s initial misconceptions about his training and abilities parallel some of the common misconceptions patients have about psychotherapy. He asks Morpheus, “What are you trying to tell me, that I can dodge bullets?” Morpheus responds, “When you’re ready, you won’t have to”.

In Carl Jung's work, we find a reconciliation of the life of the individual with the world of the archetypes. Jung believed that the individual's encounter with the unconscious is central to the process of psychological development. He theorized that certain symbolic themes, including the themes of human relational and behavioral patterns, exist across all cultures and in every individual. According to Jung, these archetypes compose what he calls the “collective unconscious”, which is our psychic inheritance, our memories as a species, the knowledge we are all born with. We are not consciously aware of it, but it influences all of our experiences and behavior. In The Matrix, Neo knows that something is wrong with the world. As Morpheus tells him, he doesn't know how he knows it, but he knows it. The knowledge is innate, and comes from the collective unconscious, where the archetypes live.

Each of the elements of his personality, or archetypes, influence Neo in his choices in the story, particularly Trinity, Morpheus, Agent Smith, and the Oracle. Neo’s final choice is his biggest decision, that of Eros or Thanatos, to live or to die. Through Trinity’s love transmitted to him in her kiss of pure faith, she breathes life, like the Holy Spirit, into Neo, and brings wholeness to his psyche. In healing his mind through the heart, Trinity provides the relationship for Neo to transcend his ego-Self relationship, the battle between the Matrix and Zion, and become “The One”. What this implies is that the shadow is accumulated over the course of our experiences in developing our ego, which is the outer aspect of the Self. As the shadow develops along with complexes in the personal unconscious, one goal is for the ego to become more relational with the Self. At the beginning of the movie, Neo is curious about something beyond his reality that he hacked to find out about; shortly after, Neo awakens into the Nebuchadnezzar ship, or the personal unconsciousness, and Winnicott’s “holding environment”), between Zion (the Self) and the Matrix (collective unconscious). All of the “unplugged” members of the ship Nebuchadnezzar correspond to the archetypes of personas in Jung’s theory of personality development.

In the analytic framework, it can be said that Neo’s problem stems from a conflict between his belief and the perception of his senses. Morpheus leads Neo on the journey of learning what is real, and what is illusion. As Neo’s mentor, teacher, father and psychotherapist archetypes, when Neo and Morpheus meet, it is because Morpheus has determined that Neo is ready to begin the therapeutic journey. Morpheus wears a pair of mirrored sunglasses that reflect Neo’s face. This suggests that, as proposed by Winnicott and Kohut (Winnicott 1967, Kohut 1984), Morpheus will serve a mirroring function and reflect Neo’s true Self back to him. As a master computer hacker himself, this is possibly how Morpheus would have known he was ready to explore the unconscious. Morpheus provides an interesting symbol as teacher and therapist, much like a higher guiding power, or Father. Common transference reactions that occur toward Morpheus seem to be of the paternal type, and Morpheus’ followers see him as a father figure. Tank even says to Morpheus, “You’re more than a leader to us. You’re our father.”

Through guiding Neo into discovering parts of himself, he reveals inner conflicts that are amenable to change, or reprogramming. Morpheus tells Neo, “They are coming for you, Neo. I can guide you but you must do exactly as I say”. The first place he meets Morpheus is in the Matrix. The first meeting between Morpheus and Neo is similar to a therapy session. Morpheus says, “All I’m offering is the truth, nothing more”. Morpheus gives Neo a choice here; the red pill or the blue pill. Truth or ignorance. Neo chooses truth. By using a variety of therapeutic skills such as interpretation, confrontation, and clarification, Morpheus guides Neo in helping him find out who he really is. “I can only show you the door. You must go through it” he says, constantly guiding Neo to make his choice. Already questioning the assumptions of his societal worldview through hacking the internet and his opposition to his job in his old Matrix life, through a series of metamorphoses in the real world, Neo is faced with several choices that further the individuation process. Though uncovering unconscious conflicts via interpretation and transference resolution, Neo demonstrates resistance throughout the story. He reacts with denial and rage when he learns that the world in which he has lived, the Matrix, is an illusion. When Morpheus explains that Neo is “the One”, Neo remains skeptical, even as he progresses in his training. Morpheus must constantly challenge Neo’s mistaken views and assumptions so that he may break free of them and overcome the perceptual manifestations of his conflicts in therapy, as represented by the war against the machines.

Jung asserted that neuroses and other psychological problems are not simply difficulties to be overcome, but opportunities for growth and maturation, whereby parts of the unconscious can be integrated into our psyche. He considered this process of psychological growth and maturation, known as individuation, to be of essential importance to each human being in society. According to Jung, the process of individuating can take a lifetime. In the movie, Neo goes through several stages of the individuation process. In doing so, he learns to believe in himself and know his true strength, underneath his persona or ego. The notion of choice, of purpose, is one of the resolution of his duality or split with the shadow, from being a passive consumer of the illusion or evolve to a place of unity and certainty in knowledge. What is, not what should be. It is no longer about choosing, but knowing, in a mystical sense of awareness. As the human experience is subjective, the only thing we can control is choice. Choosing to be the “One” is the most important choice of the film, which takes Neo until the end of the film to achieve.

Neo must acquire wisdom of the world but also wisdom within himself. In the Matrix, Morpheus brings Neo to the Oracle. The Oracle acts as Neo’s intuition. She is spiritual, feeling, feminine wisdom. A program from the system, she, like all the other programs are parts of the collective unconscious that exist to teach us about ourselves, and develop our personal unconscious/consciousness/psyche. Above her kitchen doorway is a sign that says “Temet Nosse”, Latin for “Know theyself”. The Oracle also gives Neo a choice, as each of his personality structures (or objects) do. This choice however, is one of sacrificing his life or Morpheus’s. Neo chooses to sacrifice his life after deciding to identify with his true Self. By allowing Neo to reach his own conclusions, rather than supplying him with all the answers, she allows Neo to make his own choice. In the film, she says, “You didn’t come here to make a choice. You already made the choice. The reason you came here is to figure out why you made the choice”.

In Jungian terms, Morpheus acts as Neo’s double in the film. Interestingly enough, Morpheus has dark skin, and Neo is white. The symbology of dark and light plays largely in this film, and it is also noted that the Oracle is also an African American (although a computer program). The bad characters are played by white skinned characters, such as Agent Smith (and all the agents in the film), Neo’s boss (who talks to “Mr. Anderson” in an identical way to Smith) and the Merovingian (that is seen in later films). In the play between the forces of dark and light we see the psychology of Melanie Klein’s work, the theory of the Good breast and Bad breast in the Matrix world as Mother versus the real world ( with Trinity as Mother figure). In order to resolve the dichotomy between the two, Neo must arrive at the Depressive Position, which is realized when Neo is recovered from his birth into reality and rehabilitation. Neo says, “I can’t go back, can I?” and Morpheus responds “No. But even if you could, would you?” The resolution of the Paranoid-Schizoid position between not wanting to believe the Matrix is a computer program during his first trip inside with Morpheus, and finally coming to understand that he has the choice to master this game, results in Neo taking the Depressive Position. In Object relations terms, each of the characters are objects that Neo psychically creates attachments with in this new world. These objects provide all of his developmental influences in this new world. The people who help Neo in his journey of self-discovery are Morpheus, the Oracle, and Trinity.

The childhood depressive position involves an interplay of anxieties and aggressive phantasies. The internally projected image of the mother is exposed in phantasy to sadistic tendencies. By the death instinct, the good internal mother can be (psychically) destroyed. It is crucial that parental figures are around to demonstrate the continuity of their love, which Morpheus and Trinity both do in the film. In this way, Neo perceives that what happens to good objects in phantasy does not happen to them in reality, and they are constant. The depressive position was seen by Klein as a prerequisite for social life and the establishment of an inside and an outside world is the start of interpersonal relationships. Here, Neo understands how you appear in the Matrix is the mental projection of what we believe ourself to be. Our self. However, our Self according to Jung is not actualized under these conditions; we neglect the Self and feed the system of control to think for us, to suck our energy instead of manifesting our true life purpose. Morpheus tells Neo, “The Matrix is a computer generated dream designed to keep us under control. As long as the Matrix exists, humans will never be free.” Only the free, those in Zion, who have stepped outside of the Matrix, really know what true liberation is. In order to get there, the split between the elements of his personality will have to break down before becoming unified, in a process of individuation. As soon as word is given by his anima, the process begins; shortly after meeting with Morpheus, Agent Smith, his shadow, appears. The ego and shadow have split apart and are now ready for inner work to reconcile.

The Hero Archetype was described by Jung as a common myth of all cultures, seen in terms of rite of passage in a young male. The young man must overcome an ordeal, in dealing with darkness in order to become a hero in the world. In Neo’s case, this was accomplished by winning the confrontation with his shadow, Agent Smith. Smith is the perfect shadow image of Neo. The fact that they are both white, both rebel against the system they are in (Neo being a hacker in his “other” life, and Smith being an agent) and both die in the end shows the close parallel of Neo and his shadow. They both become anomalies when they decide to choose for themselves. When they first meet, in the white interrogation room, Smith warns Neo of Morpheus; the shadow projecting fear into Neo’s psyche. He gives Neo a choice to comply with him, that Neo gives the finger to, and Smith injects him with a tracking robot, into his navel. According to Jung, the shadow is the first complex that one meets in the individuation process. The agents are a gateway to the Matrix however, they are the gatekeepers to the system. As a gateway to the Self, Neo jumps inside Agent Smith, filling him with light and destroying Agent Smith. This integration of the shadow and the ego frees up an amazing amount of psychic energy. This process signifies and initiation and becoming and individuated ego. Jung called this warring of opposites a “coniunctio”, which leads to a reconciliation of the ego and the shadow and transforms the old personality structure. The Self comes to lead the personality instead of the ego, in a new psychic wholeness.

In his work “The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious”, Jung states,
“Water is the commonest symbol for the unconscious” (Jung, 1959, p. 20). He goes on to say,

True, whoever looks into the mirror of the water will see first of all his own face. Whoever goes to himself risks a confrontation with himself. The mirror does not flatter, it faithfully shows whatever looks into it; namely the face we never show the world because we cover it with the persona, the mask of the actor. (Jung, 1959, p. 20)

According to Kohut, both grandiose and idealizing selves need to be mirrored in order for healthy personality development. Morpheus and Trinity provide the parental archetype figures for Neo to idealize, and both Morpheus and Trinity believe that Neo is the “One”, mirroring both sides of his Self. Because this mirroring is so consistent throughout the movie, Neo does not fall into developing a narcissistic injury, which occurs with Cypher, who acts as a jealous and destructive part of Neo’s shadow. Cypher feels a terrible emptiness, completely fragmented from his true Self, and he yearns to go back to the Matrix and give up all of his free will to live in ignorance. Morpheus keeps Neo intact however, by keeping calm and firm, without getting angry or judging Neo. Neo is supported in his experience by his “parents” empathic responsiveness, which allows for his therapeutic change to occur.

According to Jacques Lacan, the mirror stage is how we understand ourselves through another. The first “other” according to Lacan, is our mother, which is the Matrix that Neo seeks to know. His new mirror is Morpheus, his mentor in the Matrix. The use of a mirror to enter the 'real' world is very telling. Lacan’s “mirror stage” of an infant is when the infant first recognizes his reflection. It is only at that moment that the infant perceives himself as a separate entity from his environment. The mirror of Neo is also Agent Smith. Both Smith and Morpheus wear reflective sunglasses in the movie, which reflect Neo. In Lacan's essay, “The Mirror Stage as formative in the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience”, he describes the how child recognizes him or herself in the mirror image, emphasizing the process of identification with an outside image or entity (ie. Morpheus, Smith) induced through,

Insufficiency to anticipation – and which manufactures for the subject, caught up in the lure of spatial identification, the succession of phantasies that extends from a fragmented body-image to a form of its totality that I shall call orthopaedic – and, lastly, to the assumption of the armour of an alienating identity, which will mark with its rigid structure the subject’s entire mental development. (Lacan, Écrits (rvd. edn., 2002), “The mirror stage”, p. 5).

In the theory of self psychology, Kohut’s presumed psychological organization, the self/object system, is composed of interactions with humans called “self-object” relationships. Internal needs, that need to be partially met by another person, are called “self-object” needs. Self-objects are valued for the emotional stability that they provide. Morpheus and Trinity are the prime self-objects for Neo in the film, and they provide the two major types of self-object transferences, mirroring and idealizing. Morpheus mirrors Neo by telling him that he is the “One” that he has been searching for his whole life. Trinity tells him at the end of the film that he is the “One” that she will fall in love with. This helps to develop Neo’s internal self-esteem and self-respect, bringing him back to life literally, and allowing him to conquer the battle with his shadow. Both Trinity and Morpheus provide what Kohut called the “transference of creativity” that strengthens the self sufficiently, so that Neo could realize his skills. In self psychology, it is the intrapsychic experience of individuals (the selfobject experience), as well as the environmental conditions that shape the selfobject experience, and develop the personality.

Kohut encourages a merger of energies in therapy, although this is generally not recommended in psychoanalysis, as a sense of separateness allows people to learn to feel themselves instead of another. The therapist needs to reinforce the boundaries of self and other in Neo, helping him find his own subjectivity without taking residence in another’s boundaries. Morpheus uses the technique of abstinence by holding himself steady in the face of the client’s demands, when Neo asks Morpheus, “I can’t go back, can I?” and Morpheus responds “No. But even if you could, would you?” He gives Neo the choice to participate, and relieves the possible projective identification that may occur here otherwise. Morpheus also goes on to make interpretations of Neo’s feelings from his statement about not believing in fate because he doesn’t like the idea of not being in control of his life. Morpheus empathizes, “I know exactly how you are feeling”. By allowing for interpretation, Neo can gain insight into his behavior, thoughts and choices. This understanding of the self in a sustaining and empathic relationship with a selfobject is a motivating reason for Neo to continue treatment, and find his true Self. Being good selfobjects for Neo allows him to also assimilate the oedipal lesson, and with that change his goals and self-concept. The underlying feelings of rage toward his Matrix world mother is resolved through his new relationships to his new selfobject parents, and his feelings towards them are worked out in the transference process.

In therapy, Neo would project the shadow on the therapist as a necessary step toward advancing the individuation process. Jung wrote that only when therapy becomes a problem for the individual as well could there be healing. This is shown in one part of the film, Morpheus and Smith fight, while they are in the Matrix. Smith says to Morpheus, “When we started thinking for you, it became our civilization”. The agent takes over Morpheus’s brain and learns the information to destroy the Zion mainframe, which is essentially the Shadow taking over the Self. Together, Trinity and Neo save Morpheus, which is symbolic for the unified Self integrating all parts.

Since transference is key to therapeutic success, the patient who experiences transference will reenact his conflict in the therapy setting. The therapist must then clarify, confront, and interpret the transference to help the patient modify his defenses (if unhealthy) and resolve the conflict. We see this transference occur with Neo and with Morpheus’ other crewmembers. The idealizing transference in this case does not result in the common feelings of disappointment and letdown when the Neo realizes that the therapist is imperfect. Neo and the crewmembers will eventually have to come to terms with Morpheus’ limitations as a leader and in the process develop their own resources and strengths so that their mission can succeed. ). Patients may also develop rescue fantasies toward the therapist, (for example, when the Agents capture Morpheus, Neo chooses to try to save him) which may occur when a patient develops an intense, idealizing transference to the therapist.

Morpheus may also see himself as having rescued Neo and the others from the Matrix, with the ultimate goal of rescuing all of mankind. This may also illustrate the rescue fantasy, a countertransference reaction in which a therapist desires to rescue a patient from a difficult situation (Storr, 1990). Alternatively, Neo’s attempt to save Morpheus may allude to the life and death struggle of the dyadic relationship and how a child’s destructive rage may raise fantasies of killing off the libidinal object before the loss of omnipotence (Freud, 1936). This is a classic expression of the depressive position, a pre-oedipal fantasy and fear first described by Melanie Klein (1946). The defensive posture here is to use a primitive method of reaction formation (i.e., the transformation of an unacceptable impulse into its opposite) and rescue the benevolent parental figure.

Neo living out his narcissistic dream of being the “One” who can save the world is a potent recipe for transformation, but may pose problems for the therapist. The countertransference that the therapist may experience may be a disrespect for the grandiose claim that Neo made or was exploring, and may trigger feelings of insecurity or feeling “less than” the patient, which would destroy the balance of power in the therapeutic relationship. The therapist must learn to exercise empathy here and allow Neo to realize his full potential of self, without denouncing his attempts with disbelief or rejection. Object Relations says that narcissism is a natural aspect of the child's healthy development of a cohesive, self-reliant sense of self. Parents must respond in certain ways to foster the sense of self and self-esteem; Morpheus does this for Neo in the film by telling him that he thinks he is the one. He does so with such certainty that it is hard not to believe. In the end, it is the dedication of Morpheus and the love of Trinity that allow Neo to find his true Self and liberate himself from the prison of his unconscious mind.






References


Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. London: Hogarth Press.

Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id.(19th ed.). London: Hogarth Press.

Freud, S. (1958). Remembering, repeating and working-through: further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis. In Complete Psychological Works. (Vol. 12, pp. 145–156). London, Hogarth Press.

Freud, S. (1918). Civilization and Its Discontents. (Strachey J., & Gay P., Eds.). New York: WW Norton & Company.

Jacobi, J. (1974). Complex/Archetype/Symbol in the Psychology of C.G. Jung. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C.G. (1961). Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York: Vintage.

Jung, C.G., (1934–1954). The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious. In Collected Works (2nd ed., Vol. 9). Princeton, New Jersey: Bollingen.

Jung, C.G. (1968). Psychology and Alchemy. In Collected Works. (Vol. 12). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C.G. (1983). The Essential Jung. (Storr, A., Ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 27, 99–110.

Kohut, H. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mischoulon, D., & Beresin, V. (2004). “The Matrix”: An allegory of the psychoanalytic journey. Academic Psychiatry, 28(1), 71-77.

Storr, A. (1990). The Art of Psychotherapy. (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Wachowski, L., Wachowski, A. (2001) The Matrix: The Shooting Script. New York: Newmarket Press.

Winnicott, D.W. (1958). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In Collected Papers: Through Pediatrics to Psycho-Analysis. London: Tavistock Publications.

Winnicott, D.W. (1967). Mirror-role of the mother and family in child development. In Lomas P. (Ed.), The Predicament of the Family: A Psycho-Analytical Symposium (pp. 26–33). London: Hogarth.

Wolf, E. (1983). Empathy and countertransference. In Goldberg, A. (Ed.), The Future of Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.

Access_public Access: Public 3 Comments Print views (1,192)  

Review of Urban Yogi Contemporary Yoga Teacher Training Workshop

Posted on Aug 7th, 2007 by Andrea : Sacredchakras Andrea
 

Esalen Workshop: Urban Yogi Contemporary Yoga Teacher Training


 

The Esalen Institute, located in Big Sur, California, is a place that has to be experienced to be understood.  Defying description as an educational institution in the traditional sense, Esalen was founded in 1962 to explore alternative schools of thought, and has hosted teachers such as Alexander Lowen, Abraham Maslow, Fritz Perls, Joseph Campbell, and Stanislav Grof, among many others, to lead an impressive array of workshops over the years.  Situated along the coastline on 120 acres of land, Esalen is set beautifully against the Santa Lucia Mountains, with acres of gardens and hot mineral springs overlooking the seaside cliff-- truly a feast to the senses and soul.


As I drove along the ocean to discover this magical place for the first time, I wondered about the kind of people I would meet, what I would learn in the weeklong intensive I would be attending, and what kind of environment I would be in.  As revolutionary as Esalen is as an alternative education institution, I can say about the workshop that I was to begin that evening: Urban Yogi Contemporary Yoga Teacher Training, led by Hala Khouri and Julian Walker.  What attracted me to this workshop, other than the superior yoga teaching skills of Hala and Julian, was the integration of somatic psychology, spirituality, anatomy, and energetics, along with group process; all areas that I have a deep interest in.  Having first met Hala while attending the Santa Barbara Graduate Institute in their Somatic Psychology Master's program, I had been intrigued by her knowledge of Peter Levine's Somatic Experiencing.  Now a certified Somatic Experiencing practitioner, I was interested in learning how Hala was going to bring the practical knowledge of healing trauma to the mat.  As a Yoga teacher and certified Yoga therapist myself, I wanted to be able to apply some of this knowledge to my Master's thesis, which focuses on the resolution of sexual abuse trauma from an integral perspective, an endeavor that I would begin working on less than a week later.  This workshop was the perfect way to start this journey.


The workshop began with an opening circle on Sunday evening.  In a ritualistic manner, we each entered the dance dome, one by one, and with intention, took a seat on one of the pillows situated in a circle around the room.  Once all thirty-three of us were seated, we were introduced to Hala and Julian, and given an introduction to the workshop along with an overview of what we were going to cover during the week.  It was really happening!  I was so excited. 


Next, we went around the circle and each said our names to the group.  After each person said their name, the group said it back to us three times.  This was quite a powerful exercise.  We then went around the circle again; this time, each person introduced themselves, and answered three questions: What we do, what appeals to us about the workshop in particular, and where we are at in our process.  This was a great icebreaker and way to get to know a large group of people in a short period of time.  Even though the group was predominantly female, there was a great variety of experience and professional backgrounds to the group.  Although everyone practiced Yoga, not all were teachers.  Some were bodyworkers, dancers, psychologists, in the music, IT and even engineering industries.  It made for a great mix of people indeed. 


We ended this session with some blissful freeform dancing, and agreed to stay in reflective silence until the next morning's class.  As we walked back to our cabins, thousands of stars twinkled in the night sky so clearly, something I had missed in Los Angeles.  Upon returning to my cabin, I finally had the opportunity to meet my two roommates, which was a little strange to do in keeping silence.  I know I was interested in talking a little bit at that point, get to know each one another, but we just smiled and said goodnight.  I found the exercise of not speaking actually quite difficult; not the practice of silence itself, but the effects of this practice on my body.  Not talking after raising so much energy by telling our stories in the circle, and dancing, left me in a heightened energetic state.  Everything was intensified by the silence as well; the sounds outside the cabin, and within, the hardness of my bed, the intense amount of prana surrounding me, plus the newness of the environment, and two new roommates, added up to a lot of activation. The night seemed so alive, and I had a hard time sleeping as a result.  Following a Yoga Nidra style of progressive muscle relaxation helped somewhat, and after a while I was able to get to sleep.  Others I spoke with later the next day reflected back to me their similar experiences with not being able to sleep as well.


The next day, Monday, we began the morning class by focusing on orienting ourselves to the room.  Julian taught the beginning portion of this class, leading us through a delicious asana practice, which focused on deep hip stretches, followed by Hala who led us through a solid vinyasa yoga practice.  After a good three hour practice, we broke for lunch, sweaty and happy, and had the opportunity to get to know other members of our group.


In the afternoon, we met in dyads to discuss our process, and what we were currently going through.  We made an agreement as a group to allow others that need to talk to others about their process to be able to ask for help from others, which helped to increase the cohesiveness of the group.  We also talked about the need to keep the contents of the group's sharing in confidence, so that members would feel safe to express what they needed to.  We were then led in a workshop on "What is Trauma" by Hala, which focused on the triune brain and the physiology of trauma and trauma resolution.  This was based on Peter Levine's work and the two books, Healing Trauma (Levine, 2005), and Waking the Tiger (Levine & Frederick, 1997), both of which I read before the workshop. 


According to Levine, trauma is "the often debilitating symptoms that many people suffer from in the aftermath of perceived life-threatening or overwhelming experiences" (2005, p.7).  These experiences may include war, childhood emotional, physical or sexual abuse, childhood neglect, betrayal or abandonment, experiencing or witnessing violence, rape, catastrophic injuries and illnesses.  They may also include automobile accidents, invasive medical and dental procedures, falls and other "minor" injuries, natural disasters, being left alone, prolonged immobilization, exposure to extreme heat or cold, sudden loud noises, and birth stress.  When these events happen to children, the event is more likely to be perceived as traumatic, because a baby or child does not yet have the cognitive development and coping skills to deal with these events.


Levine (2005, p. 18) puts the symptoms of trauma in order of appearance:   

  • Hyperarrousal (increased heart rate, sweating, difficulty breathing, cold sweats, tingling, and muscular tension)
  • Constriction (breathing, muscle tone, and posture prepare for action, numbness, narrowing of perceptions)
  • Dissociation and denial (endorphins are released, disconnection between body and painful emotions)
  • Feelings of helplessness, immobility, and freezing (slows down the nervous system)


If left untreated, these symptoms can then transform, and include hypervigilance, intrusive imagery or flashbacks, hyperactivity, exaggerated startle responses, abrupt mood swings, shame, lack of self-worth, difficulty sleeping, panic attacks, addictive behaviors, amnesia, fear of death, and others, over time.  Symptoms that take longer to develop, according to Levine (2005, pp. 19-20) are excessive shyness, diminished emotional responses, inability to make commitments, chronic fatigue, psychosomatic illnesses (i.e. headaches, migraines, neck and back problems), fibromyalgia, asthma, depression, severe premenstrual syndrome, and feelings of detachment and alienation.  Another important symptom to mention is the compulsion to repeat the actions that originally caused the traumatic event, in an attempt to resolve the trauma and symptoms attached to the event. 


Levine says,

In short, trauma is about loss of connection-to ourselves, to our bodies, to our families, to others, and to the world around us.  This loss of connection is often hard to recognize, because it doesn't happen all at once.  It can happen slowly, over time, and we adapt to these subtle changes sometimes without even noticing them.  These are the hidden effects of trauma, the ones that most of us keep to ourselves.  We may simply sense that we do not feel quite right, without ever becoming fully aware of what is taking place; that is, the gradual undermining of our self-esteem, self-confidence, feelings of well-being and connection to life. (2005, p.9).


As we can see, these symptoms can cause disturbances at the physiological, emotional, mental or behavioral levels, and seriously challenge one's ability to cope.  While none of these symptoms are truly effective in resolving trauma, we can look to nature to see how animals deal with traumatic events. 


In the wild, many animals are threatened by their predators on an ongoing basis, yet animals rarely suffer from traumatic symptoms.  The response of the most primitive part of the brain, known as the reptilian brain (the brain stem and cerebellum) to a threat to survival, is to mobilize the energy to fight or flee, depending on which is the most advantageous to the animal's survival.  The brain chemistry triggers hormonal changes, including the release of the stress hormones adrenaline and cortisol.  However, should neither of these choices be possible, for example, if the animal is caught, the brain then directs the nervous system to freeze, and play dead.  The difference between humans and animals is that animals will then discharge their excess activation by shaking themselves vigorously after freezing, once the threat is gone, and then take some very deep breaths.  When we slow down this motion, we see that the animal's shaking is actually a high-speed "running" motion, which is the completion of the escape, the animal's natural response cycle to the threat.


Humans, however, still have this response within our reptilian brain; yet we often do not use an effective means of discharging our energy, instead often overriding our innate self-regulating mechanisms by bracing ourselves against the power of the sensations.  If the message to normalize is not given, then the production of adrenaline and stress hormones continues.  As a result, we keep this high level of energy trapped within our bodies, which can lead to many of the emotional, mental, physical and behaviors symptoms of trauma. 


Levine believes "that the ability to return to equilibrium and balance, after using the "immobility response" is the primary factor in avoiding being traumatized" (2005, p.30).  With the theory that trauma is primarily physiological, he believes that "trauma is something that happens initially to our bodies and our instincts.  Only then do its effects spread to our minds, emotions, and spirits" (2005, p.31).


In the "triune brain" model, as developed by Dr. Paul McLean, the brain is composed of three distinct parts: the reptilian brain, the limbic system, and the neocortex.  The reptilian brain is instinctive, reflexive, and controls behaviors such as fighting, fleeing, freezing, sex, sleep, digestion, breathing, and the heartbeat.  These behaviors are automatic, have a ritualistic quality, and are highly resistant to change.  This part of the brain is active, even in deep sleep.  The limbic brain is the emotional brain, which governs attachment to others, instincts, attention, and affective memories.  The limbic system is also involved in primal activities related to food and sex, in particular, with our sense of smell and bonding needs, and activities related to expression and mediation of emotions and feelings.  The neocortex deals with language, communication, higher cognitive functions, and voluntary movement.  These higher cognitive functions are what distinguish humans from the animals.


According to Levine's theory, when the body experiences trauma, the connection between the neocortex and the limbic system is severed, and the traumatic experience is frozen in the reptilian brain.  Common ways that people regulate themselves when they have experienced trauma are to dissociate, or dull their senses by going for a drink with friends instead.  Because the urban technological environment that many of us live in today is so stimuli-intensive, with constant noise, traffic, media, email and cell phones, we are constantly bombarded with information; this can be overwhelming and traumatizing in itself, and make processing our trauma even more difficult.  So how do we regulate ourselves in an optimal way?


Hala then taught us about the concept of titrating, or discharging activation slowly over time.  The reason that we want to titrate, rather than discharging our activation all at once, is that it could be too overwhelming for us, especially if we have carried around symptoms of trauma for a long time.  The first step to this process is to orient ourselves to our environment, get grounded, and centered in our body, in a safe "container" or environment.  This will help us to become present, and then we can see how we are feeling, sensation-wise, in the body.  By working with these resources (orienting, grounding, centering, and titration) we develop a sense of safety in the body.  We can then move on to slowly discharging the activation from the trauma, and integrating the experience in our lives.  Healing trauma is about being able to feel, and validating the feelings as they come up.  When we are resourced, we are using the tools that make our feelings navigable.  Focusing on the body's sensations will prevent us from retraumatizing ourselves by focusing solely on our emotions, and will allow us to and release our activation; we can deal with neocortex and its more complex thoughts, if necessary, later.  We may not be able to, or need to however, as we may release the trigger response without this kind of processing.  Sometimes we many not even know what we are resolving, but it is still being released.


Another Somatic Experiencing technique that Hala introduced was that of "pendulation", or pairing up what is constricted (the traumatic material) with that which is resourced.  This process assists the natural self-regulation system in discharging the activation.  By coupling the two states, the discomfort is made more manageable, so overwhelm doesn't occur.  We resource by focusing on what feels good when we are going through discomfort, and provide time to reorient to the present, the here and now, and our resources.  In SE, slow is considered fast, as the body takes time to properly integrate the experiences.  SE takes the client back to the experience, and rewrites it, allowing for the deactivation to take place.  Through this process of uncoupling fear and immobility, a new neural feedback loop is built.  The old pattern is interrupted and the new pattern (or resource) is introduced instead. 

           

Breathing is another good way to resource ourselves, because breathing is associated with the reptilian brain, which moves the focus from the neocortex, where many people get stuck.  We can experience this by tracking our expansion and contraction of breath.  Breathwork also uncouples fear from immobility.  Breath is paired up instead with constriction and helps us to stay oriented, and resourced.  Other creative ways of resourcing can involve the use of music, sound, visualization, words, and dance into the experience as well. 


Another tool we worked with was the technique of mirroring.  When we can't talk about someone's process directly, mirroring can help.  By naming the process someone is going through, and helping them to feel heard, we are validating and reflecting another person to themselves.  For example, we could say to our class, "There are a lot of shoulders up this morning".  Naming can create safety in the group, and be very healing, especially when it is done without judgment.  Mirroring can also create a connection between a feeling and the body state that the person may not realize; this connection can then help them to identify what they are feeling.  This is important for people with trauma, as they may have difficulty expressing what they are feeling, even to themselves.  Here Hala added that it is important to use the three modalities of auditory, kinesthetic, and visual cues when communicating with your clients in class as a whole, and one-on-one.  Showing, touching, and speaking, as appropriate, are important ways to reach out to our students in class, and effective ways of communicating in general.  Hala then brought up a very good point; many Yoga teachers don't necessarily have these tools to use in class.  In our practice, many things can come up for us as we release tension from the body.  We all have trauma, to some extent.  How we act as role models for our clients will show them that we can resource and deal with these issues, and maintain a safe container for them, while resonating a sense of peace and calm.  Working with our own trauma and issues helps us to be available and hold space properly for others to work with theirs. 


We then did an experiential exercise, in partners, where one partner would constrict their muscles as much as they could, and try not to be picked up by the other partner.  The other partner was to pick up the person from behind, under the arms.  This was very difficult; however, when the first partner stayed relaxed and grounded, it was even more difficult for them to be lifted.  The key to this exercise was that we can stay relaxed and be stronger than when we are fighting against something, by keeping ourselves resourced, centered and grounded. 


The second day, Hala taught the morning yoga session.  We began with a meditation, and then focused on activating our resources; orienting ourselves to the room, grounding our energy, centering ourselves.  This led to a discussion on how we stay resourced while we are feeling sensations.  This is important to be aware of, as when we or others are processing trauma, knowing that in this process, many sensations arise and let go, we can make sure that we stay resourced, to help the process along.  Staying resourced while teaching our students in class is important too, for when we have not worked out our personal issues with past relationships, these issues can come up in class, often in the form of transference and countertransference.  Transference occurs when a feeling from your past interactions with another person is transferred onto a present relationship; in this case, onto your yoga teacher.  Countertransference is essentially the same as transference, but in the opposite direction, from the teacher to the student.  It is the therapist or teacher's feeling from their past relationships that are projected onto the client.  Being aware of our past wounds in relationships, and working on these wounds to become healed, allows us to be more aware of when transference and countertransference are occurring, and allows us to be able to deal with our students and clients so that we can help others heal in the same way.  Having empathy is very important in this process, along with holding a safe container for our students.


At this point, we focused this awareness of the teacher-student relationship by exploring several different student archetypes in the asana practice.  The practice was to allow us to understand what these different states can mean for our students, and help us to build empathy for what our students may be experiencing in a class.  We were invited to try three different archetypal patterns that are often seen in students and therapy clients, and to track our body, emotions, and process to find our triggers in each one.


The three archetypal patterns we explored, in any particular order, were:


a) Resistant: doesn't trust authority, used to being let down.

b) Needy/idealizing: Desperately seeking truth, or guru.  Idealizes teacher or is "in love" with teacher, or wants teachers approval.

c) Distracted/disembodied; One who is used to gyms, with loud music and distraction, type A personality OR spacey, dreamy, barely there/barely hears teacher, is in their own world.


I found this to be an incredibly triggering experience.  Visiting some of the old patterns that I had used in the past brought up old emotions that I had not experienced for quite some time.  The Distracted/disembodied archetype did not trigger much in me, but I did identify with the Resistant archetype, feeling a deep anger in my practice when I tried out this state of being, that reminded me of how I used to feel before I started doing my personal work many years ago.  The last archetype I tried was Needy/idealizing.  This archetype reminded me very much of how I used to feel as a child, when I felt I needed to perform to receive love, or approval, especially from my parents and teachers.  At the end of the class, during Savasana, I experienced a large release of emotion, and deep tears were released.  I went outside to collect myself for a few minutes, and put my feet in the grass, which was soothing and helped me to reconnect both to nature, and myself.  I felt much better after, and realized, that this archetype does still trigger me, and I still have work to do in this area.  This was a very powerful and revealing exercise for me.


That afternoon, Julian delivered his presentation on Contemporary Shamanism and introduction to Mind-Body Psychology using the Jungian concept of the Ego-Self axis.  This was a great addition to what we had learned in the last two sessions with Hala.  Being a graduate student in Psychology, with a personal interest in shamanism, none of this information was brand new to me, but I was very happy to see it included in the workshop.


Julian started by defining the shaman traditionally as the doctor, psychologist, and spiritual facilitator of the community, the gatekeeper between the inner and outer worlds.  The role played by the shaman was the beginning of psychotherapy.  Today, we are losing the shamanic component to religion in our society.  Yet there is still something to shamanism that is universal to the human condition, and that is the story of our inner journey that each of us must make.  Today, contemporary shamanism can help us to reconnect to our inner journey, to acknowledge what that means for us, and create a sacred space for both the mind and body to heal, be it through music, dance, the breath, or another modality.  This is an important journey to take before we are able to heal others.  As outlined in Joseph Campbell's book, "The Hero with a Thousand Faces" (1949, pp. 245-246), the myth of the hero's journey involves a process of heeding the call to adventure, crossing the threshold of adventure to face a challenges and gain the reward, which leads to transformation, and a return to the world with the elixir that will restore all.


Julian then gave us an overview of Joseph Campbell's take on Carl Jung's work.  He discussed how the Self is divided into two parts, the conscious part, and the unconscious part.  The conscious part contains the ego, and is masculine in nature, whereas the unconscious is feminine, and houses intuitions and triggers.  Between the two, there exists a line of psychological defenses that are commonly used to keep traumatic memories in the unconscious and away from threatening the consciousness.  Some of these defenses are repression, denial, and projection, among many others.  This is the domain of the conscious Self.  The unconscious Self talks to the conscious Self through dreams, psychosomatic symptoms and "triggers", which also exist in the Shadow portion of our unconscious.  The Shadow collects all of the things we don't like about ourselves and stores them in the unconscious.  When we make contact with the Shadow, in doing what is known as "shadow work", this helps us to gain a better understanding of our Self, our fears and traumas, and allows for great transformation of our consciousness in their release and working through.  In the process, we create a stronger ego-Self connection, where the two parts of the can speak to each other more freely, which helps us create a more integrated Self or soul.


Julian then introduced Heinz Kohut's Self Psychology and the useful concepts of age appropriate mirroring, idealization needs and optimal disillusionment.  In development, Kohut found that these three concepts help us to internalize relationships.  The first, age-appropriate mirroring, occurs when we mirror one's process back to them.  We all need mirroring, and what we need reflected back to us is different at different ages.  There are different levels of mirroring depending on what clients need, i.e. a hand on the shoulder, or telling them what they are experiencing is okay.  Mirroring reflects back one's experience into words, and allows for the internalization of a healthy sense of self.  Idealization needs are related to how we relate to ourselves.  As children, our parents or caretakers are first idealized.  This idealization eventually this fades, as we come into a more realistic understanding of them, and this continues throughout life.  Finally, optimal disillusionment provides the child an opportunity to see that idealization is not true, but they are not traumatized by it; rather, it encourages their growth.  For example, setting a boundary frustrates the child in an optimal way, by containing their behavior, and they learn from it as a result.  Each of these concepts, when applied to the teacher-student relationship, is important in healthy development of the Self.

For the final session of this day, we had a two hour group discussion facilitated by Hala with Julian's support, on "Teacher-Student Relationships".  This brought us back to the concepts of transference and countertransference, and how to work with projection and boundaries in the teacher-student relationship. 


In terms of facilitating transference, when we are in roles where there is a power differential, our students are vulnerable, and we are there to guide them.  We need to be there for them as they are transferring onto us, so we can help them through this.  For example, people feel really good in their body after Yoga, sometimes better and safer than with sex.  Often, this can bring up sexual feelings for the student, but this is not a situation for the teacher to get their personal needs met, or provide a "corrective" emotional experience for the student.  These sexual feelings usually have nothing to do with the teacher, as flattering as it may be to think so.  This is a good time to hold appropriate boundaries in the relationship, which can provide the support and corrective emotional experience that the student (and group) needs.  When wondering what to do, we must always decide what works best for the student or client first, not our needs first.


This is especially the case for male teachers, who need to be even more careful of their boundaries with females than female teachers need to be with males.  This is because female students typically look up to men, often projecting the archetype of "Prince Charming" onto their teacher.  It is not like this for the female teacher however.  Males often look up to the female teacher as the "Mommy" archetype.  Knowing this, we have to ask what needs we are meeting as teachers?  Asking if student is okay, and needs support, is a simple statement that can trigger needs that weren't met as a child.  We also need to be aware of our own unconscious needs that need to be met.  Do we need to be needed, to rescue people, or be a caretaker?  How can I be working on getting my needs met outside of the class, so I can hold space for others in the class?  These questions are important to ask, and will shed light on how we interact with our students.  Learning about our personal process is the foundation of effective teaching and healing.


We concluded this session with an experiential subtle boundary exercise that was done with partners.  This exercise helped to create an awareness of our subtle energetic boundaries, not simply the physical ones when we are in the presence of another.  We need this awareness as teachers to create containment, rather than by stopping and drawing a boundary when things are already out of control.  If that happens, we need to ask ourselves, are we letting the boundaries go just to have people like us?


On Wednesday, we started off our three hour morning session with an asana practice led by Julian, which was wonderful.  At the end of this session, while in Savasana, we were led through the practice of Breathwork, pioneered by Stanislav Grof, a psychiatrist and one of the founders of transpersonal psychology.  The breathwork consisted of a long inhale, with a forceful exhale.  After a few minutes, tears started forming in my eyes, and I didn't know why.  It felt very innocent at first, like the gentle release of feelings, and then became unstoppable.  I didn't know why consciously.  I titrated by starting and stopping my breathwork.  I probably should have just stopped altogether, but I kept at it out of curiosity.  After the class broke I went to my cabin, and had a long shower, and a deep cry.  I realized that I must be processing some of the unconscious trauma that happened to me when I was drugged and raped by someone I trusted, several years ago.  Since I was drugged, and unconscious, the memory still lived trapped in my body.  I don't know if it is entirely resolved now, but I hope I have processed more of this at least, and I feel freer as a result.  Hala told me not to do any more processing work after this, and that now I needed to focus on integration.  She gave me some good techniques to use to regulate, such as walking barefoot on grass, putting your back or front against a tree, sleep, and having someone you love and trust put a hand on you.  I was grateful for these suggestions, and shared them with a couple of other yoginis in the workshop who were processing as well.


That afternoon, Julian gave us an overview of the anatomical "high-charge" correlations to the chakra system.  I found this very interesting, as these high-charge points in the body are related to releasing unconscious developmental processes and emotions related to the level of the chakra they are aligned with.  Having used the chakra system for personal healing, I thought this was a wonderful expansion to what I already had in my toolbox of asana practice, pranayama, and meditation.


Julian then gave us a fantastic demonstration of the work he does as a bodyworker, using his assistant Tessa as a volunteer.  In manipulating several parts of her body while laying on a massage table, Tessa went into spontaneous undulations of her spine, which looked positively ecstatic.  According to Julian, these undulations are not necessarily sexual, but can be orgasmic.  Described as energetic unwinding of layers of tension, this letting go can cause structural shifts in the body.  This can provide relief from pain syndromes in the body, which often have a psychological basis.  By opening ourselves to this and releasing the shame of sexuality, we can process our trauma on a primal level, and allow ecstatic states come forth.  Julian explained,



Like most initiations it asks us to step into new territory and look at ourselves through a new lens. Often the set of ideas, beliefs and identifications that we have adopted as "spiritual" have to be re-examined as we grow, heal and awaken to ever more grounded and whole expressions of ourselves. (Walker, email communication, July 2, 2007)


This session concluded with Julian talking about energy in the system; too much energy in a fragile system will fragment it, but just enough energy above where we are at will create an optimal amount of chaos (or frustration, like with Kohut) which will enable us to reorganize at a higher level of complexity.  This increased complexity can bring greater stability.  He warned us to watch for the level of activation; if it is too intense then we need to scale back and titrate.  In a classroom, we can offer instruction on how to titrate in class.  We can also offer support for those who may be overwhelmed.  He also mentioned that psychotic states /conditions (such as schizophrenia, bipolar, borderline, hysteria) don't respond well to the kind of bodywork that he practices, because the ego is not strong enough, and it can be destabilizing for them.  There is research, particularly from what I have seen in my studies with sexually abused trauma survivors (who have been often classified in the medical system as having hysteria), that these people do seem to do very well with somatic therapies, Somatic Experiencing, and yoga.


The next day, both Hala and Julian led our asana practice, which included mirroring exercises, and group ecstatic dance exercises.  This was freeing and wonderful, and we had the whole afternoon off to explore Esalen afterwards, during which I took the opportunity to read The Stormy Search for the Self (Grof & Grof, 1990) in the sun, take pictures, as well as a two hour long nap before the evening class.  It was really relaxing, and a good chance to soak in the Esalen spirit.


That evening, we had a closing circle, and shared our final thoughts.  This was quite an emotional session, with several people in tears by the end.  My final thoughts were those of gratitude for allowing me to process, being supported in this process.  I had known going into this weeklong workshop that the group process can trigger things in us and act as a powerful mirror unto ourselves, reflecting that which we need to work on.  I was grateful for the freedom to learn more about what I am passionate about, for such an amazing group of people to learn with, and for two wonderful teachers.  I know that this week has taught me a lot about how to make my practice both on and off the mat a more conscious and embodied one.


Friday morning, we had our final yoga practice, and a dance ritual with partners.  We then broke into freeform dance in groups, with each group dancing in the middle of whole class circle.  It was ecstatic, liberating, and free, and brings tears to my eyes thinking of how beautiful it was.  We also did some journaling work, in which we answered, "What am I moving towards, creating?  What are my dreams, aspirations?"  This was a wonderful way to close a powerful week, fully aware of the goals that I have towards helping myself and others heal, and how this workshop has helped me to move closer to understanding myself and others in the process.  During the long drive home, I happily stated my dreams and my gratitude for such an amazing workshop week.  I have taken away with me the mindfulness to keep orienting, grounding, resourcing and integrating each step of the way on this blessed journey, and I look forward to sharing these tools with others that I teach as well.


References

 

Caine, R. N. & Caine, G. (1990). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Nashville, TN: Incentive Publications.

Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press.


Frederick, A. & Levine, P. (1997). Waking the tiger: Healing trauma. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
 

Grof, C. & Grof, S. (1990). The stormy search for the self. New York: Penguin.


Levine, P. (2005). Healing trauma. Boulder: Sounds True, Inc.


Taylor, K. (1994). The Breathwork Experience: Exploration and Healing in Nonordinary States of Consciousness. Santa Cruz: Hanford Mead Publishers.

Access_public Access: Public 14 Comments Print views (470)